Rank Group CEO Issues Warning on Proposed Machine Games Duty Increase

Drew Reed · Sep 21, 2026

Rank Group CEO Issues Warning on Proposed Machine Games Duty Increase

UK bingo halls and casinos facing potential operational challenges from tax adjustments

Richard Harris, chief executive of Rank Group, which operates Mecca Bingo and Grosvenor Casinos, delivered a direct warning about proposed changes to machine games duty ahead of Chancellor John Healey’s budget scheduled for October 28, 2026, and observers note that the comments highlight risks to physical gambling venues across the United Kingdom. The executive pointed to possible duty rate adjustments reaching 40 percent on category B machines, a move that could trigger widespread venue closures and associated reductions in employment according to the company’s assessment.

Rank Group manages dozens of bingo halls alongside casino properties that rely heavily on slot machine revenue, and Harris explained how an increase in the duty rate would compress margins to the point where some locations might no longer remain viable. Category B machines, which include the majority of slot terminals found in these establishments, currently operate under a lower tax structure, yet the speculated shift to 40 percent would represent a substantial escalation from existing levels.

Details of the Budget Proposal and Industry Response

The upcoming fiscal announcement on October 28, 2026, has generated discussion around gambling taxation, and Rank Group’s leadership chose to address the matter publicly because the company operates more than 100 venues that employ thousands of staff members. Harris stated that the higher duty would force difficult decisions, including the permanent closure of sites where revenue from gaming machines forms the core of daily income. Those closures would in turn reduce local employment opportunities in regions where bingo halls and casinos serve as significant employers.

Data from industry sources indicate that machine games duty already contributes a notable share of government revenue from the gambling sector, yet Rank Group argues that further elevation could exceed the point at which many venues can sustain operations. The company’s statement emphasizes that bingo halls in particular depend on a mix of machine play and traditional games, and any sharp rise in taxation on the machine component would disrupt that balance across multiple locations.

Potential Effects on Employment and Venue Operations

Analysts tracking the sector have examined similar tax adjustments in past years, and the pattern shows that increased duties often lead to venue rationalization when operators cannot pass costs directly to customers. Rank Group’s warning aligns with this historical observation because the proposed 40 percent rate on category B machines would apply uniformly, leaving little room for individual sites to absorb the additional expense without cutting overhead. Job losses would follow from reduced operating hours, staff reductions, and outright closures, according to the company’s projection.

Interior view of a typical UK casino floor with slot machines

Mecca Bingo locations and Grosvenor Casinos properties together represent a substantial portion of the land-based gambling market in Britain, and Harris noted that many of these venues serve communities with limited alternative entertainment options. When a bingo hall closes, the effect extends beyond the immediate workforce to include suppliers, transport providers, and nearby retail businesses that benefit from foot traffic generated by the venue. The executive therefore framed the tax increase not only as a company-specific concern but as one that could ripple through local economies.

Context Surrounding Machine Games Duty Adjustments

Machine games duty applies to gaming terminals installed in casinos, bingo halls, and other licensed premises, and category B machines encompass the high-volume slot products that generate the largest share of revenue in these settings. Current rates vary by machine classification, yet the speculation around a uniform 40 percent levy on category B units has prompted pre-budget commentary from multiple operators. Rank Group’s intervention comes at a time when government revenue targets remain under scrutiny, and the chancellor’s October 28, 2026, statement is expected to outline any final decisions on duty levels.

Company records show that Rank Group has already undertaken cost-reduction measures in recent years, including site reviews and efficiency programs, and the additional tax burden would accelerate those efforts. Harris indicated that some venues already operate at thin margins, leaving little flexibility if duty costs rise sharply. The warning therefore serves as an early signal to policymakers about the downstream consequences of the proposed change before the budget is finalized.

Conclusion

The statement from Rank Group’s chief executive provides a clear account of how an increase in machine games duty to 40 percent on category B machines could affect the company’s bingo and casino estate ahead of the October 28, 2026, budget. The projected outcomes include venue closures and job losses, with the scale of impact depending on the final duty rate adopted by the chancellor. Industry participants continue to monitor developments as the date approaches, while government officials weigh revenue needs against the operational realities described by operators such as Rank Group.